<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Organic SEO Consultant &#187; 301</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.organicseoconsultant.com/tag/301/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.organicseoconsultant.com</link>
	<description>Organic Is Better For You</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 29 Jan 2012 19:13:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Google May Be Fixing Issues With 301 Reirects</title>
		<link>http://www.organicseoconsultant.com/google-may-be-fixing-issues-with-301-reirects/</link>
		<comments>http://www.organicseoconsultant.com/google-may-be-fixing-issues-with-301-reirects/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Jul 2009 16:23:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Miguel Salcido</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[SEO 301]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[301]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[301 redirects]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.organicseoconsultant.com/?p=51</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So this has been reported on before, the post that comes to mind is one by Patrick Altoft over at Blog Storm a while back. The idea is that Google is filtering certain types of 301 redirects in order to combat &#8220;bait and switch&#8221; tactics. What I mean by bait and switch is when SEOs [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.organicseoconsultant.com/google-may-be-fixing-issues-with-301-reirects/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

